4.7 Article

Tuning electrical and thermoelectric properties of freestanding graphene oxide papers by carbon nanotubes and heat treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 781, Issue -, Pages 196-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.033

Keywords

Graphene; Carbon nanotubes; Electrical conductivity; Seebeck coefficient; Nanocomposite

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/77704/2011, SFRH/BPD/84419/2012, UID/EMS/00481/2013-FCT, CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022083]
  2. FCT [UID/EEA/04436/2013, SFRH/BD/101661/2014, SFRH/BPD/95905/2013, IF/00602/2013]
  3. FEDER through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  4. FCT within CICECO Project [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-037271, PEst-C/CTM/LA0011/2013]
  5. FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941]
  6. [PTDC/CTM - NAN/5414/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016723)]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/EEA/04436/2013, UID/EMS/00481/2013, SFRH/BPD/77704/2011, SFRH/BD/101661/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of freestanding paper of graphene oxide (GO) and GO reduced by heat treatment at 180 degrees C (rGO) are tuned by addition of carbon nanotubes (CNT). The electrical conductivity of rGO with 50% of CNT is raised to similar to 2940 S/m from similar to 613 S/m for pure rGO or similar to 34 S/m for GO with 50% of CNT without reduction. Moreover, Seebeck coefficient of rGO increases with addition of CNT from -7.04 mu V/K for pure rGO to -20.82 mu V/K for rGO with 50% of CNT, presenting n-type conductivity. As result, calculated power factor PF is enhanced with increasing CNT concentration and the highest PF similar to 1.28 mu W/(K(2)m) is obtained for rGO with 50% of CNT. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available