4.7 Article

NaTi2(PO4)3/C∥carbon package asymmetric flexible supercapacitors with the positive material recycled from spent Zn-Mn dry batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 782, Issue -, Pages 576-585

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.163

Keywords

Spent Zn-Mn batteries; NaTi2(PO4)(3)/C; Flexible supercapacitor; Nitrogen doping

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272143]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017QB003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spent Zn-Mn batteries (ZMBs) pose a serious threat on eco-system and human health because of the toxic heavy metal ions released from ZMBs into the environment. In this report, carbon package is recycled from spent ZMBs and used as a positive electrode material for flexible supercapacitors. In a three-electrode system using 1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 as the electrolyte, the recycled carbon package (RCP) can deliver a specific capacitance of 100 Fg(-1) at 1 Ag-1. After 5000 cycles at 1 Ag-1, a specific capacitance of 86 Fg(-1) is retained with nearly 100% coulombic efficiency. Nanocomposite of NaTi2(PO4)(3) with nitrogen-doped carbon layer (NTP/C) is prepared through a simple co-precipitation plus annealing method. NTP/C can deliver specific capacity of 320 and 273 Fg(-1) at 1 and 10 Ag-1, using 1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 as the electrolyte. The high rate capability of NTP/C is attributed to the high specific surface area and nitrogen-doped carbon layer. Flexible asymmetric supercapacitors are assembled in configuration of NTP/C parallel to RCP, using 1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 as the electrolyte and stainless steel foil as the current collector. At 0.5 Ag-1, the typical flexible supercapacitor cell can deliver a specific energy of 17.8 W h kg(-1) with corresponding specific power of 503 W kg(-1), and retain 15 W h kg(-1) after 2000 cycles. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available