4.7 Article

Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer The SUNSHINE Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 321, Issue 14, Pages 1370-1379

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2402

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [P50CA127003, R01CA205406, R01CA118553]
  2. Gloria Spivak Faculty Advancement Award
  3. Friends of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Award
  4. Project P Fund
  5. Consano
  6. Genentech
  7. Pharmavite LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE In observational studies, higher plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels have been associated with improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 139 patients with advanced or metastatic CRC conducted at 11 US academic and community cancer centers from March 2012 through November 2016 (database lock: September 2018). INTERVENTIONS mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy every 2 weeks and either high-dose vitamin D-3 (n = 69) or standard-dose vitamin D-3 (n = 70) daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the log-rank test and a supportive Cox proportional hazards model. Testing was 1-sided. Secondary end points included tumor objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and change in plasma 25(OH) D level. RESULTS Among 139 patients (mean age, 56 years; 60 [43%] women) who completed or discontinued chemotherapy and vitamin D-3 (median follow-up, 22.9 months), the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D-3 was 13.0 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 14.7; 49 PFS events) vs 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.0; 62 PFS events) for standard-dose vitamin D-3 (log-rank P = .07); multivariable hazard ratio for PFS or death was 0.64 (1-sided 95% CI, 0 to 0.90; P = .02). There were no significant differences between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D-3 for tumor ORR (58% vs 63%, respectively; difference, -5% [95% CI, -20% to 100%], P = .27) or OS (median, 24.3 months vs 24.3 months; log-rank P = .43). The median 25(OH) D level at baseline for high-dose vitamin D-3 was 16.1 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL for standard-dose vitamin D-3 (difference, -2.6 ng/mL [95% CI, -6.6 to 1.4], P = .30); at first restaging, 32.0 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL (difference, 12.8 ng/mL [95% CI, 9.0 to 16.6], P < .001); at second restaging, 35.2 ng/mL vs 18.5 ng/mL (difference, 16.7 ng/mL [95% CI, 10.9 to 22.5], P < .001); and at treatment discontinuation, 34.8 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL (difference, 16.2 ng/mL [95% CI, 9.9 to 22.4], P < .001). The most common grade 3 and higher adverse events for chemotherapy plus high-dose vs standard-dose vitamin D-3 were neutropenia (n = 24 [35%]vs n = 21 [31%], respectively) and hypertension (n = 9 [13%]vs n = 11 [16%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with metastatic CRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D-3, vs standard-dose vitamin D-3, to standard chemotherapy resulted in a difference in median PFS that was not statistically significant, but with a significantly improved supportive hazard ratio. These findings warrant further evaluation in a larger multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available