4.0 Article

Renal Tubular Functions in Patients with Posterior Urethral Valve

Journal

IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

KOWSAR CORP
DOI: 10.5812/ijp.88804

Keywords

Posterior Urethral Valve; Renal Tubular Function; Proteinuria; Enzymuria

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University [17929]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate tubular functions of posterior urethral valve patients with preserved glomerular functions. Methods: A total of 25 children (ages 1 - 18) who underwent surgery for PUV and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) on long term follow-up and age-matched 25 healthy controls were enrolled. Blood and urine samples were collected to assess electrolyte reabsorption, proteinuria, enzymuria, urine acidification and concentration. Results: Even though microalbumin/creatinine ratio was higher in the patient group [1.00 (1.98) vs 0.31(0.34) mg/gr creatinine, P = 0.005] none of the subjects had enzymuria, overt proteinuria or hyperphosphaturia. Serum bicarbonate levels were lower and urinary pH higher in patients than the controls (23.2 +/- 2.1 VS. 24.6 +/- 1.9 mmol/L, P = 0.028 and 6.24 +/- 0.77 VS. 5.60 +/- 0.64, P = 0.004); furthermore, patients had lower urinary osmolality and density (525 +/- 214 vs. 743 +/- 194 mOsm/L, P = 0.001 and 1011 +/- 5.0 vs. 1016 +/- 6.8, P = 0.005). When patients were compared among themselves according to presence or absence of renal scarring and when patients without renal scars were compared to healthy controls, similar findings persisted. Conclusions: This study showed that during long-term follow-up of posterior urethral valve patients with normal glomerular filtration rates, even though proximal tubular functions do not seem to be impaired, acidification and concentration defects exist indicating distal tubulopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available