4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Coevolution of synchronization and cooperation in real networks

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129183119400126

Keywords

Kuramoto synchronization; cooperation; game theory; complex network

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61703281, 61803266, 91846301]
  2. PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2017A030310374, 2016A030313036]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [JCYJ20160520162743717, JCYJ20150625101524056, JCYJ20180305124628810, SGLH20131010163759789]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Foundation [JCYJ20150529164656096, JCYJ20170302153955969]
  5. Young Teachers Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University [2017041]
  6. Tencent Open Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As game theory thrives in networked interactions, we usually neglect the cost of information exchange between involved individuals. Individuals may decide (or refuse) to follow the state of their neighbors, which depends on the cost of the interactions. The payoff of a node's behavior is associated with the state difference between the node and its neighbors. Here, based on Kuramoto model, we investigate the collective behavior of different individuals in the game theory and the synchronization byproduct that is induced by the cooperation of connected nodes. Specially, we investigate the influence of network structure on the coevolutionary progress of cooperation and synchronization. We find that the networks with the higher average degree are more likely to reach synchronization in real networks. Strong synchronization is a sufficient, but not necessary condition to guarantee the cooperation. Besides, we show that synchronization is largely influenced by the average degree in both Erdos-Renyi (ER) and Barabasi-Albert (BA) networks, which is also illustrated by theoretical analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available