4.7 Article

Experimental study on explosion characteristics of hydrogen-propane mixtures

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 40, Pages 22712-22718

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.064

Keywords

Hydrogen-propane mixture; Maximum explosion pressure; Maximum rate of pressure rise; Equivalence ratio; Dilution effect

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016-YFC080-1500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5100-6122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The explosion characteristics of a hydrogen-propane mixture under different initial temperatures and at different hydrogen addition, equivalence, and dilution ratios were studied using a 20-L apparatus. First, the effects of hydrogen addition and equivalence ratio were studied. The results showed that the maximum explosion pressure and the maximum rate of pressure rise first increased, then decreased from lean to an equivalence ratio of 1.6, and reached the maximum value at the equivalence ratio of 1.2. The maximum explosion pressure and the maximum rate of pressure rise increased with the increasing hydrogen proportion of the mixtures, and the time to the maximum explosion pressure decreased. Furthermore, the mixed fuel with the equivalence and hydrogen addition ratios of 1.0 and 0.4, respectively, was explored under nitrogen or carbon dioxide dilution. Carbon dioxide exhibited a stronger dilution effect than nitrogen. For the mixed fuel with the equivalence and hydrogen addition ratios of 1.0 and 0.4, respectively, the maximum explosion pressure saliently decreased with the increasing initial temperature in the range of 25 degrees C-120 degrees C. The variation trend of experimental results was consistent with theoretical predictions. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available