4.7 Article

Image-based reconstruction for a 3D-PFHS heat transfer problem by ReConNN

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 656-667

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.069

Keywords

ReConNN; PFHS; Heat transfer; Reconstruction; Image-based

Funding

  1. Project of the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572120, 51621004]
  2. Key Projects of the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province [17A224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The heat transfer performance of Plate Fin Heat Sink (PFHS) has been investigated experimentally and extensively. Commonly, the objective function of the PFHS design is based on the responses of simulations. Compared with existing studies, the purpose of this study is to transfer from analysis-based model to image-based one for heat sink designs. Compared with the popular objective function based on maximum, mean, variance values, etc., more information should be involved in image-based and thus a more objective model should be constructed. It means that the sequential optimization should be based on images instead of responses and more reasonable solutions should be obtained. Therefore, an image based reconstruction model of a heat transfer process for a 3D-PFHS is established. Unlike image recognition, such procedure cannot be implemented by existing recognition algorithms (e.g. Convolutional Neural Network) directly. Therefore, a Reconstructive Neural Network (ReConNN), integrated supervised learning and unsupervised learning techniques, is suggested and improved to achieve higher accuracy. According to the experimental results, the heat transfer process can be observed more detailed and clearly, and the reconstructed results are meaningful for the further optimizations. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available