4.7 Article

Ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction and characterization of polysaccharides from dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) leaves

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 846-856

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.232

Keywords

Dandelion; Polysaccharides; Ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction; Structural characterization; Simulated digestion

Funding

  1. Student's Innovation Training Program of Northeast Agricultural University [201810224257]
  2. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UNPYSCT-2016146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction (UAEE) technology was employed to extract the polysaccharides from dandelion leaves (DLP). The extraction conditions were optimized by response surface method (RSM) and Box-Behnken design (BBD). The polysaccharide yield (14.05 +/- 0.95%), which well matched with the predicted value of 14.27%, was obtained under the optimum parameters: ultrasound power 500 W, ultrasound time 42 min, cellulase amount 4.90%, and particle size 80 mesh. After purification by AB-8 Macroporous Resin and Sephadex G-100 column, a novel polysaccharide (DLP-I) was isolated and its molecular weight was estimated to be 87,000 g/mol by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Gas chromatography (GC) analysis showed that DLP-I was composed of rhamnose, arabinose, mannose, galactose and glucose in the molar ratio of 1.14:1.00:1.05:4.76:1.52. 1D and 2D NMR spectra confirmed that the backbone of DLP-1 was mainly consisted of -> 4)-alpha-D-Galp-(1 ->, -> 4)-beta-D-Manp-(1 ->, -> 4)-alpha-D-Glcp-(1 ->, -> 2,4)-alpha-L-Rhap-(1 ->, and alpha-L-Araf-(1 -> with branching at O-2 and O-4 of -> 2,4)-alpha-L-Rhap-(1 ->. In addition, the digestion results showed DLP-1 could keep its stability during the simulated digestive juices. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available