4.4 Article

Effective appearance model update strategy in object tracking

Journal

IET COMPUTER VISION
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 531-541

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2018.5091

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation of Preliminary Research Field of China [6140001010201, 61403120302]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program Strategic High Technology Special Focus [H863-031]
  3. '13th Five-Year' Equipment Development Project of China [41412010202]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Education Department of Shaanxi Province [18JK0152]
  5. PhD Research Foundation Project of Shaanxi University of Technology [209020195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robust and accurate tracking for fast moving object in correlation filter framework is a challenging research problem. The appearance model update strategy impact on performance is usually very significant and hence is worth studying. Unfortunately, very few works focus on this component. This study proposes an adaptive appearance model update method, which utilises both average peak-to-correlation energy (APCE) threshold and gradient APCE threshold to measure tracking reliability. When tracking is unreliable, the update rate is modified and the initial template information is used to assist in correcting the model parameters. Different from conventional methods, both APCE threshold and gradient APCE threshold are enhanced by weighting the coefficients. More importantly, the gradient APCE threshold can capture the rapid decline of APCE which implies that the object is in fast motion. Sufficient evaluations on OTB datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can tackle challenging videos well, especially the authors obtain a gain of 4.6% in precision score on the selected 32 videos with fast motion attribute, and a mean gain of 3.0 and 2.2% in precision and success plots on OTB50, compared with the baseline tracker SAMF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available