4.7 Article

UAV-Relaying-Assisted Secure Transmission With Caching

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 3140-3153

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2895088

Keywords

Caching; physical layer security; time scheduling; trajectory optimization; UAV relaying

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61871065]
  2. open research fund of State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks [ISN19-02]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT17JC43]
  4. Xinghai Scholars Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) can be utilized as a relay to connect nodes with long distance, which can achieve significant throughput gain owing to its mobility and line-of-sight (LoS) channel with ground nodes. However, such LoS channels make UAV transmission easy to eavesdrop. In this paper, we propose a novel scheme to guarantee the security of UAV-relayed wireless networks with caching via jointly optimizing the UAV trajectory and time scheduling. For every two users that have cached the required file for the other, the UAV broadcasts the files together to these two users, and the eavesdropping can be disrupted. For the users without caching, we maximize their minimum average secrecy rate by jointly optimizing the trajectory and scheduling, with the secrecy rate of the caching users satisfied. The corresponding optimization problem is difficult to solve due to its non-convexity, and we propose an iterative algorithm via successive convex optimization to solve it approximately. Furthermore, we also consider a benchmark scheme in which we maximize the minimum average secrecy rate among all users by jointly optimizing the UAV trajectory and time scheduling when no user has the caching ability. Simulation results are provided to show the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available