4.4 Article

Concealment of Time Delay Signature of Chaotic Semiconductor Nanolasers With Double Chaotic Optical Injections

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JQE.2019.2898673

Keywords

Chaos; semiconductor nanolasers; spontaneous emission coupling factor; Purcell factor; time delay concealment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61674119]
  2. Postdoctoral innovation talent program in China [BX201600118]
  3. Young Talent fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China [20160109]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M613072]
  5. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JM6002, 2016JM6009]
  6. China 111 Project [B08038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time delay signature (TDS) concealment properties of a novel semiconductor nanolaser subject to double chaotic optical injections are investigated numerically. The TDS concealment is evaluated by the peak size of the autocorrelation function (ACF). The effects of feedback rate, injection rate, frequency detuning, Purcell cavity-enhanced spontaneous emission factor, and spontaneous emission coupling factor on the TDS concealment are carefully examined. It is found that, with the double chaotic optical injections, the TDS can be concealed in wide ranges of feedback rate, injection rate, and frequency detuning. Moreover, better TDS concealment can be achieved for a smaller frequency detuning and a larger injection rate. The 2-D maps of peak size of ACF further show that the range of parameter space contributing to better TDS concealment is wider for a moderate Purcell cavity-enhanced spontaneous emission factor and a smaller spontaneous emission coupling factor. These results may be interesting for the enhanced chaotic sources on-a-chip based on novel semiconductor nanolasers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available