4.6 Article

Wideband Circularly Polarized Fabry-Perot Resonator Antenna in Ku-Band

Journal

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 586-590

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2896940

Keywords

Broadband high gain; circular polarization (CP); Fabry-Perot resonator antenna (FPRA); magneto-electric dipole antenna (MEDA)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871399]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600349, 2017T100316]
  3. National Defense Pre-Research Foundation of China [3602004]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Again enhancement method is proposed for the circularly polarized (CP) magneto-electric dipole antenna (MEDA) over the whole Ku-band in this letter. Together with the CPMEDA as a feeding antenna, a single-layer partially reflecting surface made by a substrate with arrays of metal patches printed on both the top and bottom forms a Fabry-Perot resonator antenna. Five types of symmetrical patch, i.e., double printed circular, square, circular-ring, square-ring patches, and single printed circular patch, are compared and optimized for a better reflective phase property. Finally, the circular patch type is chosen because of its gentler reflective phase gradient, and hence the gain value of the CPMEDA is much enhanced over the whole operating band. A prototype is optimized and fabricated to verify the analysis. Measured results show that the 10 dB return-loss bandwidth is about 54% (11.7-19.8 GHz), the 3 dB gain bandwidth is 42.3% (11.7-17.2 GHz), and the 3 dB axial-ratio bandwidth is about 29.3% (12.4-16.8 GHz). The overlapped bandwidth of the three is 29.3%, and the maximum CP gain is 11.45 dBic at 14 GHz. A gain enhancement of about 2.1-5.2 dB is achieved as compared with the unloaded type. This method is a good option to design antennas in satellite communication with the merits of wide CP bandwidth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available