4.3 Article

Measurement of Muscle Strength in Haemodialysis Patients by Pinch and Hand Grip Strength and Comparison to Lean Body Mass Measured by Multifrequency Bio-Electrical Impedance

Journal

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 268-275

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000447023

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Dialysis; Protein energy wasting; Hand grip strength; Pinch strength; Muscle strength

Funding

  1. University College London
  2. Royal Free Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Muscle weakness is a risk factor for mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients; we wished to determine whether measuring the composition of the arm with bioimpedance was associated with arm muscle strength. Methods: We measured pinch strength (PS) and hand grip strength (HGS) in 250 adult HD patients with corresponding post-dialysis multifrequency bioelectrical assessments with segmental body analysis. Results: Mean age 64.0 +/- 15.6, 66% male and 45.6% diabetic. The maximum HGS in the dominant or nonfistula arm was 18.9 +/- 9.2 kg and PS 4.09 +/- 1.96 kg respectively, with a correlation of r = 0.80, p < 0.001. HGS was associated with body cell mass (beta 0.37, p < 0.001) and PS with appendicular muscle mass (beta 0.06, p < 0.001). Both HGS and PS were independently associated with the ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW); beta -139.5, p = 0.024, beta -44.8, p < 0.001 in the arm. The presence of an arterio-venous fistula increased the ECW/TBW ratio in the arm from 0.383 +/- 0.009 to 0.390 +/- 0.012, p < 0.05. Conclusion: Muscle strength measured by HGS and PS was associated with both markers of whole body and segmental body composition within the arm, particularly ECW/TBW. Bioimpedance measurements and assessment of muscle strength should be measured in the non-fistula arm. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available