4.4 Article

Calcium Isotope Ratio (δ44/40Ca) Measurements of Ca-Dominated Minerals and Rocks without Column Chemistry Using the Double-Spike Technique and Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry

Journal

GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 509-517

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12281

Keywords

Ca isotopes; Ca-rich materials; chemical purification; Ca-42-Ca-43 double spike; thermal ionisation mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, to evaluate whether bias free Ca isotope ratios can be properly achieved by thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (TIMS) using the Ca-42-Ca-43 double-spike technique without chemical purification, a series of comparable experiments (with or without column chemistry) were made on Ca-dominated minerals and rocks. Minerals, including fluorite, calcite, titanite and apatite, displayed similar Ca isotope ratios with Delta Ca-44/40(with-without) ranging from -0.02 to +0.07 parts per thousand. For Ca-rich rocks, we mainly focused on the carbonates since they are the main repositories of Ca at the surface of the Earth. Coral, stalagmite, carbonatite, dolomite, marble and limestone are studied here. Interestingly, delta Ca-44/40(SRM) (915a) of these minerals and rocks without chemical purification displayed little drift compared with that of rocks with chemical purification, with Delta Ca-44/40(with-without) merely spanning from -0.04 to +0.04 parts per thousand. This implies that Ca isotope ratios can be achieved without column chemistry, possibly due to a property of TIMS in which Ca ions are only ionised at a target temperature and with a specific activator without ionising other ions. Therefore, for Ca-dominated minerals or rocks, we suggest that column chemistry is unnecessary if they are totally dissolved and mixed in proper proportion with the Ca-42-Ca-43 double spike for TIMS measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available