4.6 Article

Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement for 3C downhole microseismic data based on the 3D shearlet transform and improved back-propagation neural networks

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages V245-V254

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2018-0621.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [41574096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the seismic responses of unconventional hydraulic fracturing, downhole microseismic signals play an essential role in the exploitation of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. In geologic structure interpretation and reservoir development, highquality downhole microseismic data are necessary. However, the characteristics of downhole microseismic signals, such as weak energy and high frequency, bring great difficulty to signal-to-noise ratio enhancement. How to suppress the random noises in 3C downhole microseismic signals becomes problematic. To solve this problem, the 3D shearlet transform is introduced into downhole microseismic data processing. Different from the 2D shearlet transform, the correlation among the 3C of downhole microseismic signals is fully considered in the 3D shearlet transform, which enables the 3D shearlet transform to suppress random noise more effectively. In addition, for accurate selection of 3D shearlet coefficient, the back-propagation (BP) neural network is applied to the selection of coefficients. Unlike conventional threshold functions, BP neural networks can achieve optimal results by repeated training. At the same time, a new weight factor is proposed to improve the misconvergence of BP neural networks. Experimentally our method has been used to process synthetic and real 3C downhole microseismic signals, with results indicating that, compared with conventional methods, our new algorithm exhibits better performance in valid signal preservation and random noise suppression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available