4.7 Article

Tracing subducted oceanic slabs in the mantle by using potassium isotopes

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages 353-360

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.05.013

Keywords

Potassium isotopes; Subducted oceanic slabs; Enriched mantle reservoirs; Continental basalts; Northeast China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41703031]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620899]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC [MOST 105-2628-M-001-002-MY4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Substantial quantities of oceanic slabs are known to be recycled into the mantle through subduction. However, tracing their fate in the mantle through studies of mantle-derived samples is not always straightforward. As K represents an omnipresent element in subducting crustal materials, its two stable isotopes (K-39 and K-41) display outstanding potential in tracing recycled crustal materials in the mantle. Here we report the first set of K isotopic data for a suite of well-characterized continental basaltic lavas from Northeast China. The delta K-4(1) of these lavas exhibit large variation from -0.81 parts per thousand to -0.15 parts per thousand, compared with the narrow range of unaltered oceanic basalts (-0.43 +/- 0.03 parts per thousand). The isotopic variations, together with geochemical data obtained in earlier studies, cannot be ascribed to chemical weathering, crystal fractionation, crustal contamination, or partial melting, but are consistent with the presence of diverse crustal materials in magma sources. Recycled oceanic crust and sediments both have contributed to the contrasting K isotopic signature observed in these lavas. Our study here highlights the potential of using K isotopes to trace different types of recycled crustal materials in the mantle and places new constraints on the generation of enriched mantle reservoirs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available