4.4 Article

Proteostasis Environment Shapes Higher-Order Epistasis Operating on Antibiotic Resistance

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 212, Issue 2, Pages 565-575

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302138

Keywords

epistasis; proteostasis; antibiotic resistance

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation RII Track-2 Focused EPSCoR Collaborations [1736253]
  2. Precision Health Initiative at Indiana University
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office of Integrative Activities [1736253] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have affirmed that higher-order epistasis is ubiquitous and can have large effects on complex traits. Yet, we lack frameworks for understanding how epistatic interactions are influenced by central features of cell physiology. In this study, we assess how protein quality control machinery-a critical component of cell physiology-affects epistasis for different traits related to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Specifically, we disentangle the interactions between different protein quality control genetic backgrounds and two sets of mutations: (i) SNPs associated with resistance to antibiotics in an essential bacterial enzyme (dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR) and (ii) differing DHFR bacterial species-specific amino acid background sequences (Escherichia coli, Listeria grayi, and Chlamydia muridarum). In doing so, we improve on generic observations that epistasis is widespread by discussing how patterns of epistasis can be partly explained by specific interactions between mutations in an essential enzyme and genes associated with the proteostasis environment. These findings speak to the role of environmental and genotypic context in modulating higher-order epistasis, with direct implications for evolutionary theory, genetic modification technology, and efforts to manage antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available