4.3 Article

TAS2R38 bitter taste genotype is associated with complementary feeding behavior in infants

Journal

GENES AND NUTRITION
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12263-019-0640-z

Keywords

TAS2R38; Infants; Complementary food

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundGenetically mediated sensitivity to bitter taste has been associated with food preferences and eating behavior in adults and children. The aim of this study was to assess the association between TAS2R38 bitter taste genotype and the first complementary food acceptance in infants.Parents of healthy, breastfed, term-born infants were instructed, at discharge from the nursery, to feed their baby with a first complementary meal of 150mL at 4 to 6months of age. They recorded the day when the child ate the whole meal in a questionnaire. Additional data included food composition, breastfeeding duration, feeding practices, and growth at 6months. Infants' TAS2R38 genotypes were determined at birth, and infants were classified as bitter-insensitive (genotype AVI/AVI) and bitter-sensitive (genotypes AVI/PAV or PAV/PAV).ResultsOne hundred seventy-six infants and their mothers were enrolled; completed data were available for 131/176 (74.4%) infants (gestational age 39.31.1weeks, birth weight 3390 +/- 430g). Bitter-insensitive were 45/131 (34.3%), and bitter-sensitive were 86/131 (65.6%). Thirty-one percent of bitter-insensitive infants consumed the whole complementary meal at first attempt, versus 13% of bitter-sensitive ones (p=0.006). This difference was significant independently of confounding variables such as sex, breastfeeding, or foods used in the meal. Growth at 6months did not differ between the two groups.Conclusions p id=Par4 Differences in TAS2R38 bitter taste gene were associated with acceptance of the first complementary food in infants, suggesting a possible involvement in eating behavior at weaning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available