4.7 Article

Classification for invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using a deep neural network compared with experienced endoscopists

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 407-414

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.245

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Cancer invasion depth is a critical factor affecting the choice of treatment in patients with superficial squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the diagnosis of invasion depth is currently subjective and liable to interobserver variability. Methods: We developed a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system based on Single Shot MultiBox Detector architecture for the assessment of superficial esophageal SCC. We obtained endoscopic images from patients with superficial esophageal SCC at our facility between December 2005 and December 2016. Results: After excluding poor-quality images, 8660 non-magnified endoscopic (non-ME) and 5678 ME images from 804 superficial esophageal SCCs with pathologic proof of cancer invasion depth were used as the training dataset, and 405 non-ME images and 509 ME images from 155 patients were selected for the validation set. Our system showed a sensitivity of 90.1%, specificity of 95.8%, positive predictive value of 99.2%, negative predictive value of 63.9%, and an accuracy of 91.0% for differentiating pathologic mucosal and submucosal microinvasive (SM1) cancers from submucosal deep invasive (SM2/3) cancers. Cancer invasion depth was diagnosed by 16 experienced endoscopists using the same validation set, with an overall sensitivity of 89.8%, specificity of 88.3%, positive predictive value of 97.9%, negative predictive value of 65.5%, and an accuracy of 89.6%. Conclusions: This newly developed AI system showed favorable performance for diagnosing invasion depth in patients with superficial esophageal SCC, with comparable performance to experienced endoscopists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available