4.7 Article

Fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas

Journal

FUEL
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages 884-891

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.098

Keywords

Biological desulfurization; Fully aerobic conditions; H2S-rich biogas; Two-stage bioscrubber; Renewable energy

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTM2014-54517-R]
  2. Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energetica SENER-CONACYT (Mexico) [247006]
  3. University of Valencia [UV-INV-EPC17-548351]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) [APOSTD/2017/121]
  5. FEDER funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fully aerobic bioscrubber for the desulfurization of H2S-rich biogas was developed in the present study by coupling an absorption column and a bubble column bioreactor. The bioscrubber treated H2S loading rates of 37, 59, and 100 g Sm-liquid(-3) h(-1) at gas residence times of 6.6, 4.1 and 2.4 min in the absorption column, respectively. Stable H2S removal efficiencies above 80% were recorded at all the conditions tested. The bioscrubber was robust towards short-and long-term operation shutdowns (5 and 18 days), the H2S removal performance being recovered after few hours. The aerated bubble column bioreactor was operated at slightly alkaline conditions (pH 8 +/- 0.5), which prevented H2S stripping and allowed sulfur oxidation performances higher than 75% regardless of the operating conditions tested. Bacterial community characterization by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing revealed that the operating conditions (slightly alkaline pH, sulfate concentrations of up to 25,000 g m(-3) and dilution rates of 5.7 x 10-(3-)8.6 x 10(-3) h(-1)) shaped a specialized community highly efficient for H2S oxidation. Three Proteobacteria were predominant in the bubble column bioreactor, namely Thioalkalimicrobium cyclicum, Stappia sp. and Ochrobactrum sp. with relative abundances of 68.18, 13.49 and 7.61%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available