4.7 Article

Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 5763-5771

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06200-0

Keywords

Pancreatic neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Autoimmune disease; Carcinoma; pancreatic ductal; Magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To compare focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI), and to assess diagnostic performance of the lesion contrast at arterial phase (AP) (Contrast(AP)) for differentiating between the two diseases. Methods Thirty-six patients with focal-type AIP and 72 patients with PDA were included. All included patients underwent CE-MRI with triple phases. The signal intensity (SI) of the mass and normal pancreas was measured at each phase, and the lesion contrast (SIpancreas/SImass) was compared between AIP and PDA groups. The sensitivity and specificity of Contrast(AP) using an optimal cutoff point were compared with those of key imaging features specific to AIP and PDA. Results The lesion contrast differed significantly between AIP and PDA groups at all phases of CE-MRI; the maximum difference was observed at AP. For AIP, the sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (87.5%) of Contrast(AP) (cutoff <= 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 38.9-88.9%; specificity, 48.6-95.8%), except for the halo sign. For PDA, the sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (94.4%) of Contrast(AP) (cutoff > 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 40.3-68.1%; specificity, 72.2-94.4%), except for the discrete mass. Conclusions Quantitative analysis of the lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at AP, was helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA. The diagnostic performance of Contrast(AP) was mostly comparable or higher than those of the key imaging features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available