4.6 Article

Prognostic value of elevated lipoprotein(a) in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13117

Keywords

acute coronary syndromes; cardiovascular prevention; lipids

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SPUM 33CM30-124112, SPUM 33CM30-140 336, 32473b_ 163271, SNSF 320030-150025]
  2. Geneva University Hospitals
  3. Swiss Heart Foundation
  4. de Reuter Foundation
  5. Gerbex-Bourget Foundation
  6. Gustave-Prevot and Arthemis Foundation (Fondation Dragon Bleu)
  7. Roche Diagnostics
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Medtronic
  11. Merck Sharpe and Dome (MSD)
  12. Sanofi-Aventis
  13. St. Jude Medical
  14. Zurich Heart House-Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Zurich, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Minimal lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] target values are advocated for high-risk cardiovascular patients. We investigated the prognostic value of Lp(a) in the acute setting of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Materials and methods Plasma levels of Lp(a) were collected at time of angiography from 1711 patients hospitalized for ACS in a multicentre Swiss prospective cohort. Associations between elevated Lp(a) >= 30 mg/dL (cut-off corresponding to the 75th percentile of the assay) or Lp(a) tertiles at baseline, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or stroke, were assessed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C] and triglycerides. Results Lp(a) levels range between 2.5 and 132 mg/dL with a median value of 6 mg/dL and a mean value of 14.2 mg/dL. A total of 276 patients (23.0%) had Lp(a) plasma levels >= 30 mg/dL. Patients with elevated Lp(a) were more likely to be of female gender and to have higher levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides. Higher Lp(a) was associated with failure to reach the LDL-C target <1.8 mmol/L at 1 year (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.13-2.58, P = 0.01). No association was found between elevated Lp(a) and MACE at 1 year (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.64-1.73), nor for Lp(a) tertiles (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.52-1.28, P > 0.20) or standardized continuous variables (0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.19 for each increase of standard deviation). Conclusions Our real-world data suggest high Lp(a) levels at time of angiography are not predictive for cardiovascular outcomes in patients otherwise medically well controlled, but might be useful to identify patients who would not be on LDL-C targets 1 year after ACS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available