4.4 Article

Advanced-stage cancer and time to diagnosis: An International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) cross-sectional study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13100

Keywords

bias; breast neoplasms; colorectal neoplasms; delayed diagnosis; diagnosis; early detection of cancer; lung neoplasms; ovarian neoplasms; primary health care; time factors; waiting lists

Funding

  1. Cancer Council Victoria Funding Source: Medline
  2. Danish Cancer Society Funding Source: Medline
  3. Public Health Agency NI Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHS England Funding Source: Medline
  5. Scottish Government Funding Source: Medline
  6. Victorian Department of Health and Human Services Funding Source: Medline
  7. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Funding Source: Medline
  8. Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP) Funding Source: Medline
  9. Aarhus University Funding Source: Medline
  10. Northern Ireland Cancer Registry Funding Source: Medline
  11. Cancer Research Wales Funding Source: Medline
  12. CancerCare Manitoba Funding Source: Medline
  13. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions Funding Source: Medline
  14. Guidelines Audit and Implementation Network (GAIN) Funding Source: Medline
  15. Danish Health and Medicines Authority Funding Source: Medline
  16. University of Edinburgh Funding Source: Medline
  17. National Cancer Action Team Funding Source: Medline
  18. Welsh Government Funding Source: Medline
  19. University College London Funding Source: Medline
  20. Norwegian Directorate of Health Funding Source: Medline
  21. European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC) Funding Source: Medline
  22. Cancer Care Ontario Funding Source: Medline
  23. Macmillan Cancer Support Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate the relationship between tumour stage at diagnosis and selected components of primary and secondary care in the diagnostic interval for breast, colorectal, lung and ovarian cancers. Methods Observational study based on data from 6,162 newly diagnosed symptomatic cancer patients from Module 4 of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. We analysed the odds of advanced stage of cancer as a flexible function of the length of primary care interval (days from first presentation to referral) and secondary care interval (days from referral to diagnosis), respectively, using logistic regression with restricted cubic splines. Results The association between time intervals and stage was similar for each type of cancer. A statistically significant U-shaped association was seen between the secondary care interval and the diagnosis of advanced rather than localised cancer, odds decreasing from the first day onwards and increasing around three and a half months. A different pattern was seen for the primary care interval, flat trends for colorectal and lung cancers and a slightly curved association for ovarian cancer, although not statistically significant. Conclusion The results confirm previous findings that some cancers may progress even within the relatively short time frame of regulated diagnostic intervals. The study supports the current emphasis on expediting symptomatic diagnosis of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available