4.7 Article

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 40, Issue 31, Pages 2632-2653

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372

Keywords

clinical trial protocols as topic; hemorrhage; percutaneous coronary intervention

Funding

  1. Abbott Vascular
  2. Alvimedica
  3. Amgen
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Biosensors
  6. Biotronik
  7. Boston Scientific
  8. Celonova
  9. Chiesi
  10. Cordis
  11. Daiichi Sankyo
  12. Edwards Lifesciences
  13. Janssen
  14. Medinol
  15. Medtronic
  16. Orbusneich
  17. Portola
  18. Sanofi
  19. Sinomed
  20. Sahajanand Medical Technologies
  21. Terumo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available