4.7 Article

Population susceptibility differences and effects of air pollution on cardiovascular mortality: epidemiological evidence from a time-series study

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages 15943-15952

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04960-2

Keywords

Air pollution; Cardiovascular mortality; Time-series analysis; Susceptibility differences

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1302500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is insufficient evidence on the relationship between air pollution and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) in northeast China. Here, we explored the short-term effects of air pollution on CVD mortality and preliminarily investigated differences in population susceptibility to air pollution in Shenyang, China. CVD mortality, air pollution, and meteorological data during 2013-2016 were obtained. Time-series analysis was applied to evaluate the association between air pollution and daily CVD mortality with different lag structures. In the single-pollutant model, each 10g/m(3) increase in PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and O-3 concentrations and 1mg/m(3) increase in CO concentrations at lag0 (same day) was significantly associated with an increase of 0.40% (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.59%), 0.26% (0.12-0.40%), 0.43% (0.16-0.70%), 0.90% (0.14-1.67%), 0.76% (0.21-1.32%), and 3.33% (0.97-5.75%), respectively, in overall CVD mortality. Susceptibility to air pollutants was higher among females, elderly people, and ischemic heart disease patients. Furthermore, air pollution effects on CVD mortality were 2-8 times greater during the non-heating period. In conclusion, the air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, O-3, and CO showed significant positive effects on CVD mortality in Shenyang, China. These findings highlight the adverse effects of air pollution and suggest the need for personal protective equipment and reduction of air pollution sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available