4.8 Article

Carcinogenic risk of N-Nitrosamines in Shanghai Drinking Water: Indications for the Use of Ozone Pretreatment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 12, Pages 7007-7018

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07363

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [81630088, 81273035]
  2. Chang Jiang Scholars Program, Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan
  3. Key Project from the Chinese Ministry of Science [2017YFC1600200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-Nitrosamines are drinking water disinfection byproducts that pose a high carcinogenic risk. We hypothesized that raw water treatment processes influence the types and concentrations of nitrosamines in drinking water, thereby posing differential health risks. We compared the finished water of two water treatment plants (WTP-A, WTP-B) serving Shanghai, China. Both plants use the Qingcaosha reservoir as a water source to generate drinking water with conventional but distinct treatment processes, namely preoxidation with sodium hypochlorite (WTP-A) vs ozone (WTP-B). Average nitrosamine concentrations, especially that of the probable human carcinogen (2A) N-nitrosodimethylamine, were higher in finished (drinking) water from WTP-A (35.83 ng/L) than from WTP-B (5.07 ng/L). Other differences in mean nitrosamines in drinking water included N-nitrosodipropylamine (42.62 ng/L) and N-nitrosomethylethylamine (26.73 ng/L) in WTP-A in contrast to N-nitrosodiethylamine (7.26 ng/L) and N-nitrosopyrrolidine (59.12 ng/L) in WTP-B. The estimated adult cancer risk from exposure to mixed nitrosamines was 1.83 times higher from WTP-A than from WTP-B drinking water. Children exposed to nitrosamines had a significantly higher cancer risk than adults (p < 0.05). Disease burden exceeded 10(6) person-years. Taken together, these data suggest that use of ozone in the preoxidation step can reduce nitrosamine formation in drinking water and thereby lower the population cancer health risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available