4.7 Article

First determination of high levels of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in dolphins from Southern European waters

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 289-295

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.027

Keywords

Brain; Plastic debris; Tissue distribution; Tri-n-butyl phosphate; Tris(chloroethyl) phosphate

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya (Consolidated Research Group 2017 - Water and Soil Quality Unit) [SGR 01404]
  2. Loro Parque Foundation (Flame Project)
  3. CEPSA, EcoCet Project [CGL2011-25543]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates for the first time organophosphorus flame retardant (OPFR) occurrence in the Alboran Sea delphinids (Spain). OPFRs were detected in all the individuals with concentration levels up to 24.7 mu g/g lw. Twelve out of sixteen tested analytes were detected, being TBOEP which presented the highest detection frequency, and IDPP which presented the highest levels of concentration. OPFR distribution in different tissues (blubber, brain, kidney, muscle and liver) was evaluated. The pattern distribution showed the highest contribution for blubber (mean value of 68%) and the lowest contribution for liver (mean value of 2%). Seven OPFRs were detected in brain samples showing their capacity to surpass the blood-brain barrier and reach the brain. Moreover, high affinity for the brain tissue was observed. This is extremely important due to the neurotoxic effects of several compounds such as TCEP and TNBP. OPFR levels were compared with previously published PBDE concentrations, and no significant differences were observed. Taking into account the lower use and lower bioaccumulation and biomagnification capacities of OPFRs, this could indicate an additional OPFR source of pollution in addition to their use as FRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available