4.0 Review

Importance of Genetic Studies in Consanguineous Populations for the Characterization of Novel Human Gene Functions

Journal

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 187-196

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12150

Keywords

Consanguineous populations; gene function; autozygosity; Mendelian disease; complex disease

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC UK)
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/8, G1000427]
  3. Medical Research Council [1171120, G1000427, MC_UU_12013/8] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G1000427, MC_UU_12013/8] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consanguineous offspring have elevated levels of homozygosity. Autozygous stretches within their genome are likely to harbour loss of function (LoF) mutations which will lead to complete inactivation or dysfunction of genes. Studying consanguineous offspring with clinical phenotypes has been very useful for identifying disease causal mutations. However, at present, most of the genes in the human genome have no disorder associated with them or have unknown function. This is presumably mostly due to the fact that homozygous LoF variants are not observed in outbred populations which are the main focus of large sequencing projects. However, another reason may be that many genes in the genomeeven when completely knocked out, do not cause a distinct or defined phenotype. Here, we discuss the benefits and implications of studying consanguineous populations, as opposed to the traditional approach of analysing a subset of consanguineous families or individuals with disease. We suggest that studying consanguineous populations as a whole can speed up the characterisation of novel gene functions as well as indicating nonessential genes and/or regions in the human genome. We also suggest designing a single nucleotide variant (SNV) array to make the process more efficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available