4.7 Article

Particulate air pollution on cardiovascular mortality in the tropics: impact on the elderly

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0476-4

Keywords

Air pollution; Cardiovascular mortality; Tropics; Elderly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAir pollution has a significant health impact. Most data originate from temperate regions. We aim to study the health impact of air pollution, particularly among the elderly, in a tropical region.MethodsA daily time-series analysis was performed to estimate excess risk (ER) of various air pollutants on daily death counts amongst the general population in Singapore from 2001 to 2013. Air pollutants included particulate matters smaller than 10m, and 2.5m (PM10, PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O-3) and sulphur dioxide (SO2). The studied outcomes were non-accidental and cardiovascular mortality. Single-day lag and distributed lag models were studied and adjusted for confounders.ResultsIn single-day lag models, a 10g/m(3) increase in particulate matter was associated with significant increases in non-accidental (PM10 ER: 0.627%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.260-0.995% and PM2.5 ER: 0.660%; 95% CI: 0.204-1.118%) and cardiovascular mortality (PM10 ER: 0.897; 95% CI: 0.283-1.516 and PM2.5 ER: 0.883%; 95% CI: 0.121-1.621%). This was significant in the elderly 65years but not in those <65years and were seen in the acute phase of lag 0-5days. Effects by other pollutants were minimal. For cardiovascular mortality, the effects turned protective at a cumulative lag of 30days in the elderly and could due to harvesting.ConclusionsThese first contemporary population-based data from an equatorial country with tropical climate show that exposure to particulate air pollution was significantly associated with non-accidental mortality and cardiovascular mortality, especially in the elderly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available