4.3 Review

Amazonian foods and implications for human biology

Journal

ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 330-348

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2016.1196245

Keywords

Traditional foods; nutrition transitions; subsistence-based populations

Funding

  1. NSF Dissertation Improvement Grant
  2. Social Science Research Council Dissertation Fellowship
  3. Organization of American States Dissertation Fellowship
  4. Fulbright-Hayes Research Award
  5. NSF Grant [BNS-8519490]
  6. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundation [6861]
  8. National Science Foundation [BCS 0201936]
  9. NIH [R21- HD47943]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Diets of subsistence-based Amazonian populations have been linked to local resources, but are changing with market penetration. Objective: To review the available data on traditional Amazonian foods and diets and evaluate their implications for human biology as a step toward understanding nutrition transitions in the region. Methods: This study used the Human Relations Area Files for information on the diets of Amerindian groups in the Amazon Basin from 1950 to the present, and used other published sources and the authors' own data. Results: Data on food use was identified for only nine groups and dietary intake data for individuals in only three of the groups. A diet based on starchy staples (manioc and plantains) and fish, supplemented with a limited variety of other plant and animal foods, was found. Bitter manioc-based foods were associated with the consumption of cyanogens and fish with the consumption of mercury. Diets of adults appear to be adequate in energy and protein and low in fats. Children's diets were not well documented. Conclusion: Based on the limited available data, Amazonian diets are restricted in variety, but appear to be adequate in energy and protein for adults, but likely insufficiently nutrient-dense for children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available