4.4 Review

Literature review on a U-shaped closed loop geothermal energy development system

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1618990

Keywords

Literature review; Geothermal energy development; U-shaped wells; closed loop system; effective heating distance

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Projects of China [2016ZX05042, 2017ZX05039, 2016ZX05039]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China [51504269, 51490654, 40974055]
  3. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [C201605]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB250900]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-1030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geothermal energy is becoming more attractive nowadays. Compared with enhanced geothermal recovery method, developing geothermal energy using a closed loop heat exchanger possesses unique advantages, such as no fluid exchange with the geothermal reservoir. U-shaped closed loop geothermal energy development system was proposed in recent years with high energy efficiency. In this paper, we reviewed the U-shaped closed loop geothermal energy development system from literature and, then, conducted a case study based on previous models. It is found that: (a) the effective heating distance is an important parameter that can be used for economic analysis; (b) the effective heating distance grows with producer number; (c) the wellbore starting from the turning point to well-head should be insulated; (d) a higher temperature can be obtained not only from by increasing the effective heating distance, but also by decreasing mass flow rate to a reasonable level; (e) the turning point will come earlier when the mass flow rate is smaller, while it will come later when the mass flow rate is larger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available