4.7 Article

Energy efficiency and energy justice for US low-income households: An analysis of multifaceted challenges and potential

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 763-774

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.020

Keywords

Energy justice; Energy efficiency; Low income; Demand response; Flexibility; Residential Energy Consumption Survey

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS 1541117]
  2. Engineering Research Center Program of the NSF
  3. Department of Energy under NSF [EEC-1041877]
  4. CURENT Industry Partnership Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy poverty intertwines with the issues of energy inequality and energy justice, presenting a particular challenge for low-income households (LIHs). This study explores energy justice in the U.S. through the lens of several interconnected questions: Do energy assistance programs have adequate participation rates? How accessible are energy efficiency (EE) appliances? Are there different energy practices across income groups? How does time schedule of energy practices differ across income groups, and how is it connected to energy demand flexibility? Based on two representative data sets, this study finds that affordability and accessibility remain serious problems for LIHs. LIHs have lower participation rates in many EE programs and own fewer EE appliances and smart grid technologies. Additionally, thermostat control strategies are different across income levels. LIHs tend to set one fixed temperature, even when they own a programmable thermostat, which is less energy efficient. LIHs engage in more energy practices throughout the daytime than their counterparts and show the least pronounced morning and evening peaks, indicating a relatively inflexible schedule and barriers to accepting demand response programs. This study concludes with policy implications for making energy more affordable, accessible, flexible, and better for the environment, while being fair to those often underserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available