4.7 Article

Optimization-based assessment framework for carbon utilization strategies: Energy production from coke oven gas

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages 1-14

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.007

Keywords

Energy system; Optimization; Process model; Carbon utilization; Strategy evaluation

Funding

  1. KRICT big project of the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology [SI1801-06]
  2. Incheon National University
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [SI1801-06] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop an optimization-based framework to systematically analyze and assess carbon utilization strategies. To achieve this goal, we generated a superstructure consisting of a number of carbon utilization strategies, which included a series of technologies (separation and reaction) to convert carbon sources into final products. We then estimated the technical and economic parameters of all the included technologies using interactive process models. The flow and relationship information in the superstructure and the technical and economic parameters from the process models are used to develop optimization models capable of assessing the carbon utilization strategies with four different criteria: product quantity, energy efficiency, production cost, and revenue. With the proposed framework, we can answer a range of interesting questions about carbon utilization - what is the best strategy for the production of a certain product or for the utilization of a given carbon source? The capability of the proposed framework is illustrated with a coke oven gas case study. As a result, the optimal production strategies of hydrogen, methane, methanol and liquid fuels are identified using four different criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available