4.5 Article

VindbyA Serious Offshore Wind Farm Design Game

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12081499

Keywords

offshore wind energy; operation and maintenance; serious game; outreach; wind farm design; wind farm siting; metocean conditions; foundation design; installation; decomissioning

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [642108]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [642108] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To maintain the increasing interest and development in offshore wind energy, novel training tools for engineers and researchers are needed. Concurrently, educational outreach activities are in demand to inform the public about the importance of offshore wind energy. In this paper, the development of a serious game about the design and management of offshore wind farms is presented to address such demands. Such a serious game may enable a new audience to explore the field of offshore wind as well as provide researchers entering the field a better understanding of the intricacies of the industry. This requires a simulation that is realistic but also effective in teaching information and engaging outreach. Ultimately, increased public support and expanded training tools are desired to improve decision-making and to provide opportunities to test and integrate innovative solutions. The work presented here includes the game design and implementation of a prototype game. The game design involves building a game framework and developing a simplified simulation. This simulation addresses weather prediction, offshore wind farm design, operation and maintenance, energy demand, climate change, and finance. Playtesting of the prototype demonstrated immersion and informed decision-making of the players and surveys revealed that knowledge had increased while playing the game. Recommendations for future versions of the game are listed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available