4.7 Article

Non-canonical cMet regulation by vimentin mediates Plk1 inhibitor-induced apoptosis

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201809960

Keywords

cMet; drug combination; NSCLC; Plk1; vimentin

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA016672]
  2. Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant [CA070907]
  3. University of Texas PDX Development and Trial Center [U54CA224065]
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Lung Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-17-1-0206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To address the need for improved systemic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we previously demonstrated that mesenchymal NSCLC was sensitive to polo-like kinase (Plk1) inhibitors, but the mechanisms of resistance in epithelial NSCLC remain unknown. Here, we show that cMet was differentially regulated in isogenic pairs of epithelial and mesenchymal cell lines. Plk1 inhibition inhibits cMet phosphorylation only in mesenchymal cells. Constitutively active cMet abrogates Plk1 inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Likewise, cMet silencing or inhibition enhances Plk1 inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Cells with acquired resistance to Plk1 inhibitors are more epithelial than their parental cells and maintain cMet activation after Plk1 inhibition. In four animal NSCLC models, mesenchymal tumors were more sensitive to Plk1 inhibition alone than were epithelial tumors. The combination of cMet and Plk1 inhibition led to regression of tumors that did not regrow when drug treatment was stopped. Plk1 inhibition did not affect HGF levels but did decrease vimentin phosphorylation, which regulates cMet phosphorylation via beta 1-integrin. This research defines a heretofore unknown mechanism of ligand-independent activation of cMet downstream of Plk1 and an effective combination therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available