4.5 Review

Recent development in chitosan nanocomposites for surface-based biosensor applications

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 40, Issue 16-17, Pages 2084-2097

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201900066

Keywords

chitosan; immobilization; nanocomposites; surface-based biosensors

Funding

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2017-67007-26150] Funding Source: Medline
  2. U.S. Department of the Interior [D15PC00284] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have witnessed ever expanding use of biosensors in the fields of environmental monitoring, homeland security, pharmaceutical, food and bioprocessing, and agricultural industries. To produce effective and reliable biosensors, good quality immobilization of biological recognition elements is critical. Chitosan and its nanocomposites emerge as an excellent immobilization matrix on biosensor surface. As a natural polysaccharide, chitosan has many useful characteristics, such as high permeability and mechanical strength, biocompatibility and non-toxicity, availability, and low cost. Due to the presence of amino and hydroxyl groups on chitosan, chitosan can easily crosslink with a variety of nanomaterials. This investigation of chitosan nanocomposite-based biosensors presents recent development and innovations in the preparation of chitosan nanocomposites in coordination with biosensors for various bio-detection applications, including chitosan nanocomposites formed with carbon nanomaterials, various inorganic and biological complexes. These chitosan nanocomposite based biosensors have demonstrated good sensitivity selectivity and stability for the detection of different types of targets ranging from glucose, proteins, DNAs, small biomolecules to bacteria. It is in our hope that this review will offer guidance for the development of novel biosensors and open up opportunities in the field of biosensor research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available