4.6 Article

Procurement strategies of E-retailers under different logistics distributions with quality- and service-dependent demand

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100853

Keywords

Product and service supply chain; Procurement strategy; Third-party logistics; Product quality; Logistics service level

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771164, 71702129]
  2. Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC630232]
  3. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Project [18ZLZXZF00380]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops game-theoretic models to study a procurement strategy problem faced by an e-retailer selling products online under different logistics distribution systems. The e-retailer can purchase products directly from a manufacturer under its own brand or indirectly from a brand-name company and then deliver the products to consumers through logistics services. By comparing and analysing e-retailers' procurement equilibrium strategies under different logistics, we find that e-retailers with different logistics systems have identical procurement preferences when the procurement cost is low or high. However, when the procurement cost is moderate, the e-retailer with third-party logistics is more motivated to adopt direct procurement. In addition, when indirect procurement has a smaller market influence, e-retailers are more inclined toward direct procurement even if the demand is more sensitive to brand-name products. Furthermore, under certain conditions, pricing rules are quite opposite between different procurement modes such that the price decreases even if the cost is more sensitive to the logistics service level in indirect procurement. Moreover, the brand-name company may set a lower resale price instead when improving quality becomes more expensive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available