4.6 Article

Analysis of the effect of applying external mechanical pressure on next generation silicon alloy lithium-ion cells

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 306, Issue -, Pages 387-395

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.138

Keywords

Silicon-alloy; NMC 622; Pressure study; External mechanical pressure

Funding

  1. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [653531]
  2. Flanders Make
  3. FIVEVB project
  4. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [653531] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research will focus on characterising and analysing next generation batteries consisting of siliconalloy/graphite blend anode combined with a nickel rich lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC 622) as cathode. The study is performed on prototype pouch cells (1.4 Ah). Furthermore, the effect of applying external pressure on the pouch cell is investigated. The application of external pressure has a significant beneficial impact, more specifically a 19% increase in capacity combined with a significant decrease of 50% of the discharge ohmic resistance. To investigate and quantify the pressure variation over the state of charge (SoC) a dedicated set-up has been developed which allows to apply an external pressure while measuring the pressure variation. Up to 30 N of pressure variation is observed during static tests, while no pressure variation can be observed during short pulses, demonstrating its potential to use pressure as SoC estimator. Finally, a study on the effect of initial applied external pressure on the cells' lifetime has shown that the initial applied pressure, within the range of tested pressures, has little impact on the cells' performance and lifetime. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available