4.4 Article

Examining daily physical activity in community-dwelling adults with stroke using social cognitive theory: an exploratory, qualitative study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 2631-2639

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1568591

Keywords

Outcomes expectations; physical activity; self-efficacy; self-regulation; social support; social cognitive theory; stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5T32HL130357-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: A better understanding of psychosocial factors underlying daily physical activity (i.e. physical activity performed throughout the day) in stroke survivors could be used to develop interventions to promote post-stroke physical activity, particularly in individuals for whom exercise is difficult. Methods: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 ambulatory, community-dwelling stroke survivors. Interview transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis, guided by Social Cognitive Theory, to investigate outcomes expectations, self-efficacy, self-regulation, and social-support for daily physical activity. Results: Participants reported that physical and mental health, and independence and recovery, were important outcomes expectations. Self-efficacy was enhanced through mental perceptions and mastery experiences. Planning, problem-solving, reviewing performance, and establishing routines that require physical activity were important self-regulation strategies. Social support provided praise and encouragement and physical assistance, but was also a barrier when friends and family were overprotective. Conclusions: Participants reported that the investigated Social Cognitive Theory constructs were important psychosocial factors for daily physical activity. Future research and clinical investigations should empirically test the use of strategies to modify these factors for promoting daily physical activity in community-dwelling adults with stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available