4.6 Article

Microstructures of dome-shaped hillocks formed on B doped CVD homoepitaxial diamond films

Journal

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2019.05.008

Keywords

CVD; Homoepitaxial diamond film; TEM; Growth defect; Dome-shaped hillock; Twins

Funding

  1. Advanced Characterization Nanotechnology Platform, Nanotechnology Platform Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan at the Research Center for Ultra-High Voltage Electron Microscopy (Nanotechnology Open

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various types of harmful growth defects lowering crystal quality are often produced during growth of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) homoepitaxial diamond films. Among these, in this study, microstructures of the dome-shaped hillock (DH) have been studied in details mainly using cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM images and selected area electron diffraction patterns indicated that the internal of the DH is composed of single crystal (single domain) diamond whose crystallographic direction is the same as that of the film or the substrate. However, in the internal area of the DHs, there are many dislocations, most of which occur near the boundary regions between the film and the DH and extend to the inside of the DH. In the boundary regions, extra diffraction spots at 1/3 and 2/3 positions in fundamental reflections along [111] directions were observed in the selected area electron diffraction patterns, demonstrating that the boundary regions consist of hybrid structures of parents and twins with common {111} planes. It was also been found that particles (sub mu m in diameter) exist around the interface between the substrate and the film at the bottom of the DHs, strongly suggesting that the DHs nucleate from the particles around the interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available