4.5 Article

Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptide 4 inhibitors: A 52-week prospective observational study

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 65-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.008

Keywords

Dapagliflozin; Empagliflozin; Quadruple combination antidiabetic drugs; SGLT2 inhibitor; Type 2 diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To directly compare the effectiveness and safety between two distinct sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin, as part of a quadruple oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This study was an open-labeled, prospective, 52-week study conducted in T2D patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) ranging 7.5-12.0% with metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Patients were divided into either empagliflozin (25 mg/day) or dapagliflozin (10 mg/day). The outcome measures included changes in HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and cardiometabolic variables and the safety profiles. Results: In total, 350 patients were enrolled with empagliflozin (n = 176) and dapagliflozin (n = 174), respectively. After 52 weeks, both groups showed significant reductions in HbA(1c) and FPG, but the reduction was greater in the empagliflozin group (P < 0.001). Both groups showed significantly decreased blood pressure and body weight and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were increased in the empagliflozin (between groups, P = 0.035). Both groups showed similar safety profiles. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors can be effectively used as a fourth OAD in T2D patients who are treated with three other OADs. More specifically, empagliflozin was more effective in reducing HbA1c and improving other cardiometabolic parameters than dapagliflozin. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available