4.3 Review

Artificial liver support in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 187-191

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000584

Keywords

acute liver failure; acute-on-chronic liver failure; artificial liver support; cirrhosis; extracorporeal liver assist device; liver support systems; molecular adsorbent recirculating system; plasma exchange; plasmapheresis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Liver failure is a life-threatening condition, and an artificial liver is highly desirable to replace the failing liver-functions in the waiting time for liver regeneration to happen or until liver transplantation can be undertaken. This review focuses on the efficacy of using artificial extracorporeal liver support devices. Recent findings Artificial liver support devices such as the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), fractionated plasma separation and adsorption, and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are well tolerated. MARS and TPE improve systemic haemodynamics and the grade of hepatic encephalopathy. However, randomized, controlled trials of MARS and fractionated plasma separation and adsorption have failed to show improvement in survival in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Only TPE improves survival in patients with ALF by ameliorate the release of ammonia, damage-associated molecular patterns and sB7 (CD80/86) from the necrotic liver. No randomized, controlled trials on survival in patients with ACLF using TPE have been done. Summary Liver support systems such as MARS and TPE may temporarily improve systemic haemodynamics and the degree of encephalopathy. However, TPE is the only procedure that improves survival in patients with ALF. The role of TPE in ACLF remains unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available