4.4 Article

Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages E138-E146

Publisher

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4131

Keywords

Breast cancer; follow-up; survivorship; supportive care needs; preferences; virtual care

Categories

Funding

  1. Pat Nichols and Bob Tundermann Cancer Care Fund
  2. ELLICSR Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Improved treatments resulting in a rising number of survivors of breast cancer (BCa) calls for optimization of current specialist-based follow-up care. In the present study, we evaluated well survivors of BCa with respect to their supportive care needs and attitudes toward follow-up with various care providers, in varying settings, or mediated by technology (for example, videoconference or e-mail). Methods A cross-sectional paper survey of well survivors of early-stage pT1-2N0 BCa undergoing posttreatment follow-up was completed. Descriptive and univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between survivor characteristics, supportive care needs, and perceived satisfaction with follow-up options. Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results The 190 well survivors of BCa who participated (79% response rate) had an average age of 63 +/- 10 years. Median time since first follow-up was 21 months. Most had high perceived satisfaction with in-person specialist care (96%, 177 of 185). The second most accepted model was shared care involving specialist and primary care provider follow-up (54%, 102 of 190). Other models received less than 50% perceived satisfaction. Factors associated with higher perceived satisfaction with non-specialist care or virtual follow-up by a specialist included less formal education (p < 0.01) and more met supportive care needs (p < 0.05). Concerns with virtual follow-up included the perceived impersonal nature of virtual care, potential for inadequate care, and confidentiality. Conclusions Well survivors of BCa want specialists involved in their follow-up care. Compared with virtual followup, in-person follow-up is perceived as more reassuring. Certain survivor characteristics (for example, met supportive care needs) might signal survivor readiness for virtual or non-specialist follow-up. Future work should examine multi-stakeholder perspectives about barriers to and facilitators of shared multimodal follow-up care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available