4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of geopolymers derived from coal gangue, fly ash and red mud

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 287-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.076

Keywords

Geopolymer; Coal gangue; Fly ash; Red mud; Synthesis; Characterization; Unconfined compressive strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51323014, 51579132]
  2. Ministry of Education [2015THZ02-2-20161080101, 2015THZ01-1-20161080079]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering [SKLHSE-2019-D-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a growing need to utilize large stockpiles of the industrial byproducts including coal gangue (CG), fly ash (FA) and red mud (RM) which can pose potential environmental problems. The CG, FA and RM contain aluminosilicates which can be precursors for the synthesis of geopolymers. This research studied the utilization of CG, FA and RM by silicate activation into geopolymers. Binary mixes of CG and RM and ternary mixes of CG, FA and RM were prepared and cured at temperatures ranging from 80 to 800 degrees C. The unconfined compressive strength tests were performed on the specimens to determine their mechanical strength. Nitrogen adsorption, mercury intrusion porosimetry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to study the textural, structural and morphological characteristics of the end products. At lower curing temperatures, the ternary mixtures of CG, FA and RM showed higher strength gains when compared to the binary mixtures of CG and RM. The textural characteristics revealed that the reduction in pores and specific surface area do not necessarily result in higher compressive strength values. Furthermore, the cementitious gels formed at high temperatures resulted in well-bonded geopolymers with homogenous structures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available