4.7 Article

FRP-confined tuff masonry columns: regular and irregular stone arrangement

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 621-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.015

Keywords

Carbon fibre; Mechanical properties; Strength; Mechanical testing

Funding

  1. (Italian) Department of Civil Protection -ReLUIS 2017-2018
  2. Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture of the University of Naples Federico II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) represents one of the most diffuse and effective strengthening technique for retrofitting columns in existing buildings when presenting insufficient mechanical properties. In fact, the confinement effect provided by wraps with high-tensile strength and stiffness induces significant enhancement of the mechanical behaviour. In this paper experimental results of axial compression tests on both un-confined and FRP-confined prismatic yellow tuff masonry columns are presented. In particular, two types of masonry arrangements, regular and irregular, were reproduced in order to investigate the effectiveness of the confinement on column typologies widely used in the past in Southern Italy and Mediterranean basin. The performed experimental tests allowed to obtain the constitutive axial and transversal stress-strain laws and to evaluate the improvement of the mechanical behaviour, in terms of strength and ductility, due to FRP confinement. The results have highlighted a significant difference in the shape of the constitutive law for confined masonry with respect to the one of confined concrete. Contrary to FRP confined concrete members, in the case of confined masonry members specific theoretical constitutive model has been not yet developed. To this aim, in this paper the various stress-strain laws developed for FRP-confined concrete elements has been applied to masonry elements too and a comparative analyses between experimental and theoretical results has been carried out.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available