4.2 Article

Current Psychotropic Medication Use and Contributing Factors Among Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment

Journal

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 59-69

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1054773819838678

Keywords

antipsychotics; behavioral symptoms; dementia

Categories

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR002014, TL1 TR002016] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR015982] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a high rate of psychotropic medication use among residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, with limited association with demographic factors and behavioral symptoms. Further research is needed to explore the impact of deprescribing, person-centered behavioral interventions, and providers' beliefs on psychotropic medication use.
This study described current use and predictors of psychotropics among residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. This was a secondary data analysis using baseline data from the first 341 residents in an ongoing trial. Predictive measures included age, gender, race, depressive symptoms, agitation, resistiveness to care, depression, cognition, pain, comorbidities, facility factors, and state. Overall 63% (n = 211) received at least one psychotropic medication, 16% (n = 52) an anti-seizure medication, 23% (n = 77) an anxiolytic, 30% (n = 99) an antidepressant, 2% (n = 8) a sedative hypnotic, 28% (n = 93) an antipsychotic medication, and 9% (n = 29) an opioid. Testing of models explained 9% to 15% of psychotropic medication use. There were high rates of psychotropic medication use and a limited association between demographic factors, behavioral symptoms, and psychotropic medication use. Continued research is needed to explore the impact of deprescribing, person-centered behavioral interventions, and beliefs of providers on psychotropic medication use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available