4.3 Review

Survey methods for neuropsychologists: A review of typical methodological pitfalls and suggested solutions

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 13-31

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1590642

Keywords

Survey research; neuropsychology; methodology; total survey error; tailored design method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Survey research has enjoyed an increase in popularity, in part due to the availability of user-friendly software programs for online survey development and deployment. Neuropsychologists often use this methodology to learn about common clinical practices and attitudes in the field or to assess outcomes for patients. This paper aims to provide an overview of sound methods and common problems in survey research, along with specific recommendations for neuropsychologists wishing to conduct their own surveys or judge the quality of survey research. We also discuss some recent challenges and changes in the field of survey methodology. Method: We provide a brief literature review on survey design and methodology, as well as a review of recent studies addressing current challenges such as sampling, measurement, and response rates. Results: We suggest best practices that should be implemented when designing, administering and reporting on neuropsychological survey-based research studies. We discuss two approaches to improve survey design, Total Survey Error and the Tailored Design Method. Conclusions: In spite of the current challenges in modern survey research, with lower response rates and the proliferation of internet surveys, survey research continues to be a valuable tool in neuropsychology. We offer a list of DO's and DON'T's to guide neuropsychologists planning to conduct surveys of their field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available