4.3 Article

KCNQ1OT1, HIF1A-AS2 and APOA1-AS are promising novel biomarkers for diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.13094

Keywords

apolipoprotein A-1 antisense RNA; coronary artery disease; hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-antisense RNA 2; KCNQ1 opposite strand; antisense transcript 1; long noncoding RNAs; peripheral blood monocyte cells

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2016CQ23]
  2. Qingdao Applied Basic Research Project [18-2-2-48-jch]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81741173]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) as biomarkers for coronary artery disease (CAD). We measured the levels of three atherosclerosis- or cardiac-related lncRNAs in peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMCs) from 20 CAD patients and 20 non-CAD control participants using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) methods. We found that the levels of lncRNA KCNQ1 opposite strand/antisense transcript 1 (KCNQ1OT1), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-antisense RNA 2 (HIF1A-AS2) and apolipoprotein A-1 antisense RNA (APOA1-AS) were significantly increased in CAD patients (KCNQ1OT1 increased by 2.38-fold, P = 0.00042; HIF1A-AS2 increased by 2.00-fold, P = 0.0001; APOA1-AS increased by 4.52-fold, P = 0.000048). The area under the ROC curve was 0.865 for KCNQ1OT1, 0.852 for HIF1A-AS2, and 0.967 for APOA1-AS. Furthermore, the combination of lncRNAs resulted in a much higher AUC value of 0.990 for the prediction of CAD. Spearman's correlation analysis showed that APOA1-AS was positively correlated with NT-proBNP, CKMB, MYO and HsTnT, whereas HIF1A-AS2 was correlated with NT-proBNP and HsTnT. Hence, the elevation of KCNQ1OT1, HIF1A-AS2 and APOA1-AS predicts CAD and these molecules may be considered as novel biomarkers of CAD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available