4.6 Article

The effect of the equatorial Pacific cold SST bias on simulated ENSO teleconnections to the North Pacific and California

Journal

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
Volume 53, Issue 7-8, Pages 3771-3789

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-019-04746-9

Keywords

El Nino/Southern Oscillation; Sea surface temperature bias; North Pacific teleconnections; Rainfall over California; Perturbed physics ensemble; CMIP5

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2_170523]
  2. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03G0837A]
  3. [754]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2_170523] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precipitation in California is modulated by variability in the tropical Pacific associated with El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO): more rainfall is expected during El Nino episodes, and reduced rainfall during La Nina. It has been suggested that besides the shape and location of the sea surface temperature ( SST) anomaly this remote connection depends on the strength and location of the atmospheric convection response in the tropical Pacific. Here we show in a perturbed physics ensemble of the Kiel Climate Model and CMIP5 models that due to a cold equatorial SST bias many climate models are in a La Nina-like mean state, resulting in a too westward position of the rising branch of the Pacific Walker Circulation. This in turn results in a convective response along the equator during ENSO events that is too far west in comparison to observations. This effect of the equatorial cold SST bias is not restricted to the tropics, moreover it leads to a too westward SLP response in the North Pacific and too westward precipitation response that does not reach California. Further we show that climate models with a reduced equatorial cold SST bias have a more realistic representation of the spatial asymmetry of the teleconnections between El Nino and La Nina.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available