4.6 Article

On developing data-driven turbulence model for DG solution of RANS

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1869-1884

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.004

Keywords

Artificial neural network; Discontinuous Galerkin method; Fluid; Optimal brain surgeon; Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model

Funding

  1. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [20151452021and 20152752033]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61732006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods have been receiving more and more attentions in the area of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) because of their high-accuracy property. However, it is still a challenge to obtain converged solution rapidly when solving the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations since the turbulence models significantly increase the nonlinearity of discretization system. The overall goal of this research is to develop an Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) model with low complexity acting as an algebraic turbulence model to estimate the turbulence eddy viscosity for RANS. The ANN turbulence model is off-line trained using the training data generated by the widely used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model before the Optimal Brain Surgeon (OBS) is employed to determine the relevancy of input features. Using the selected relevant features, a fully connected ANN model is constructed. The performance of the developed ANN model is numerically tested in the framework of DG for RANS, where the DG+ANN method provides robust and steady convergence compared to the DG+SA method. The results demonstrate the promising potential to develop a general turbulence model based on artificial intelligence in the future given the training data covering a large rang of flow conditions. (C) 2019 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available